Legal Opinion
United States v. Peter Kiewit & Sons' Co.
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided November 24, 1964No. Civ. F-15-64PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PLUMMER, District Judge.
Plaintiff commenced this action under the Miller Act, 40 U.S.C.A. §§ 270a— 270e, to recover premiums due for workmen’s compensation insurance provided by plaintiff to the defendant Jack Edwards, d/b/a Edwards Painting and Decorating, a subcontractor.
The case is presently before the court ■on the motion of the defendants Peter Kiewit & Sons’ Co., the prime contractor, and its surety, Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., to dismiss the action on the ground that the Miller Act, 40 U.S.C.A. § 270a, does not render the prime contractor and its surety liable for premiums for…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. Munsey Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Clifford F. MacEvoy Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Calvin Tomkins Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States Ex Rel. Sherman v. Carter Constr. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Buza v. Columbia Lumber CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
- Continental Casualty Company, a Corporation v. The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of the Robertson Lumbercompany, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- J. J. Henry Co., Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- United States Ex Rel. Way Panama, S. A. v. Uhlhorn InternationalDistrict Court, Canal Zone · 1965
- United States ex rel. Olson v. W.H. Cates Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- United States Ex Rel. Cobb-Strecker-Dunphy & Zimmerman, Inc. v. M.A. Mortenson Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1989
- United States ex rel. Cobb-Strecker-Dunphy & Zimmerman, Inc. v. M.A. Mortenson Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.