Bennett v. Achord

PICKETT, Judge.

This is a companion case to Dugas v. Achord, La.App., 238 So.2d 761, and for the reasons therein assigned, defendant, Jerome Achord, should respond in damages for whatever loss of property the plaintiff sustained.

The trial court analyzed the evidence relating to the extent of damages to the plaintiff’s automobile; and concisely and clearly stated it as follows:

“The Court was not satisfied with the testimony offered concerning the damages to the 1957 Chevrolet automobile claimed by Mr. Bennett. His demand was for $369.11, represented by an estimate of damages in that amount. Two…