Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Webber & Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1916No. 13334PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered October 16, 1915, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

The complaint in this case alleged in brief, that respondent and the appellant corporation, which was engaged in the real estate brokerage business, by its agent, J. H. Webber, entered into a written contract by the terms of which respondent was made the agent of the appellant for the purpose of certain sales, to be known as the rooming house and hotel department sales, and that respondent was to receive as compensation for her services fifty per cent of all commissions made through her efforts; that, pursuant to the terms of this contract, respondent negotiated between J. H. Thomas and one…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jones v. KehoeWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. McCleary v. WillisWashington Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dura v. Walker, Hart & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. De Benedictis v. GerechoffNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  3. Glendale Realty, Inc. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  4. Connerton v. AndrewsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Kellman v. Arthur Rubloff & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API