Legal Opinion

Van Deurzen v. Yamaha Motor Corp. USA

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided September 29, 2004No. 03-2417PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

¶ 1. This action by Steven R. Van Deurzen, his mother and his brother arose from a jet ski accident in which Steven's arm was amputated. The plaintiffs successfully convinced the trial court that the accident occurred on navigable waters and that maritime law should apply. It turned out to be a Pyrrhic victory when a judgment and order of the trial court dismissed the claim as time-barred by a maritime statute of limitations. Now on appeal, new counsel takes the opposite position, arguing that the trial court erred in applying maritime law to this action. This case presents a textbook example…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wheeldin v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Mueller v. BrunnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Bradley Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Jenkins v. SabourinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Muslin v. Frelinghuysen Livestock ManAgers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Park Manor, Ltd. v. State Department of Health & Family ServicesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007
  3. Patrick Cudahy Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006
  4. Riggs v. West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Riggs v. West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API