Armstrong v. State

Ruffin, Judge.

A jury found Jamie Armstrong guilty of criminal attempt to violate the Georgia Controlled Substarices Act. On appeal, Armstrong challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. Armstrong also asserts that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress and in admitting two letters into evidence without proper authentication. Armstrong’s assertions lack merit, and we affirm.

1. Viewed in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict, 2 the evidence shows that Armstrong, Shameik Blount, and Raymond Hines lived in North Carolina. Blount had known Armstrong since junior high…