Legal Opinion

Hammett v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 6, 2000No. A00A1763PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, Judge.

Phillip Hammett was tried before a jury and, notwithstanding his acquittal on related charges, was found guilty of theft by taking a Snapper riding lawnmower, the property of Jerrideen Arrington, with a value greater than $500. In a custodial statement, Hammett admitted taking the mower one night from the Arrington residence, cranking and riding it down the road and hiding it in some bushes, and the next day trading it for $300 worth of crack cocaine. In five enumerations, Hammett challenges the admission of his custodial statement, the testimony of unlisted witnesses, and the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Chapel v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  2. High v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
  3. Henderson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  4. Lewis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  5. Paradise v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
  2. Talton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  3. Anderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  4. Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API