Legal Opinion
Seymour v. Hull & Moreland Engineering
District Court, C.D. California
Decided August 10, 1976No. CV 74-307-AAHPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAUK, District Judge.
Said cause having been heard, evidence both oral and documentary having been in troduced, and having been submitted for decision, the Court now makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in relation to the complaint in intervention:
FINDINGS OF FACT
THE COURT FINDS THAT:
1. The International Union of Operating Engineers, Local Union No. 12, was and is an unincorporated labor organization in which employees participate, and which exists for the purpose of dealing with employers concerning grievances, wages, hours and terms and conditions of employment.
2. At…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Winton Kemmis v. James P. McGoldrick Individually and Doing Business as James P. McGoldrick Consulting EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Byrnes v. Debolt Transfer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Northern California Retail Clerks Unions and Food Employers Joint Pension Trust Fund v. Jumbo Markets, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Orange Belt District Council of Painters No. 48 v. Dave Kashak Dba Dave Kashak Painting Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Bugher v. Consolidated X-Ray Service Corp.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.