Legal Opinion

Skelly v. New York Elevated Railroad

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided February 5, 1894PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from equity term. Action by Patrick Skelly against the New York Elevated Railroad Company and another. There was judgment in favor of plaintiff. Defendants appeal. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the Court

■BOOKSTAVER, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiff, as the owner in fee of the premises Nos. 21, 23, and 25 Ninth avenue, between Little West Twelfth street and Thirteenth street, for an in*305junction and damages by reason of the erection, maintenance, and operation of defendants’ road. It is the usual abutting property owners’ action, about which so much has been written that there is-little or nothing to be said in further elucidation of the law governing such cases. Appellants contend that the court erred in refusing to find defendants’ seventeenth, eighteenth, and nineteenth requests,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bohm v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Newman v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Vanderwerker v. PeopleNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  4. Gardner v. EberhartIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Brady v. PageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gruber v. New York City Railway Co.New York Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Carlson v. WintersonNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895
  3. In re City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API