Legal Opinion

Smith v. Smith

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1879PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from Linn County. This is a suit by the respondent against the appellant for divorce upon two grounds: 1. Fraudulent representations by the appellant relied upon by the respondent at the time of the marriage to the effect that she had always led a chaste life, while in fact she had prior to such time given birth to an illegitimate child; 2. Cruel and inhuman treatment, by falsely charging the respondent in the presence of others of the crime of adultery with his…

Read the full summary

Appeal from Linn County. This is a suit by the respondent against the appellant for divorce upon two grounds: 1. Fraudulent representations by the appellant relied upon by the respondent at the time of the marriage to the effect that she had always led a chaste life, while in fact she had prior to such time given birth to an illegitimate child; 2. Cruel and inhuman treatment, by falsely charging the respondent in the presence of others of the crime of adultery with his daughter-in-law. The allegations relied upon by the respondent were denied by the appellant, except that which related to the…

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Boise, J.:

The appellant claims that the first count of the complaint which alleges that the appellant was guilty of fraud and false representations or concealments of her real char*101acter, and thereby induced the respondent to contract the marriage, does not state sufficient facts to constitute a cause of suit.

The allegations of the complaint referred to as charging fraud are, that the appellant before the marriage represented herself as having been always a chaste and virtuous woman, and that by reason of these representations the respondent was induced to contract the marriage,…

2Cited by25 opinions

  1. MacDonald v. MacDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Wesley v. WesleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  3. Lyon v. LyonIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  5. Domschke v. DomschkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API