Legal Opinion

State v. Carriker

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 14, 2011No. ED 95020PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROY L. RICHTER, Chief Judge.

Donald Howard Carricker (“Defendant”) appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion for a new trial. We affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

Defendant was convicted on two counts of second-degree statutory sodomy. The jury deliberated for almost three hours before sending the judge a question asking, “If hung jury, will Defendant be retried?” The judge brought the jury into the courtroom and answered the question. At the same time, the judge, over Defendant’s objection, sua sponte submitted MAI-CR 3d 312.10 (“the hammer instruction”) to the jury and instructed them to resume…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. FasseroSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
  2. Vicknair v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  3. State v. CoppleMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. State v. KinderMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. State v. GriffithMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State of Missouri v. Calvin HutsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. State v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. State v. AdkisonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. State v. BrandMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. State v. SniderMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API