Legal Opinion

Greenblatt v. State Board of Equalization

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 21, 1957No. Civ. 21959PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.

Plaintiffs were engaged, generally, in providing precut lumber and other building materials for “do-it-yourself" builders. Believing they were entitled to a sales tax refund, plaintiffs brought this action. They have appealed from an adverse judgment.

It is plaintiffs’ position that they were exempt from the state sales tax because they were either contractors or a service organization. They also challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain adverse findings on these issues. The State Board of Equalization levied the tax on the theory that plaintiffs primarily were selling materials and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Primm v. PrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Kennedy v. IsenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. Sill v. ReeseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Sears v. StarbirdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Levine v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Wicktor v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Overly Manufacturing Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Roberts v. GravesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Western Concrete Structures, Inc. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API