Legal Opinion
Cranston v. City of Richmond
California Supreme Court
Decided December 30, 1985No. S.F. 24834Published
1Opinion of the Court
40 Cal.3d 755 (1985)
710 P.2d 845
221 Cal. Rptr. 779
ERIC CRANSTON, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
CITY OF RICHMOND et al., Defendants and Respondents.
Docket No. S.F. 24834.
Supreme Court of California.
December 30, 1985.
COUNSEL
William H. Sortor and Carroll, Burdick & McDonough for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Malcolm Hunter, City Attorney, for Defendants and Respondents.
OPINION
GRODIN, J.
Appellant Eric Cranston was discharged from his job as a Richmond City Police Officer. The city personnel board sustained the discharge, and the superior court denied a petition for writ of administrative mandamus. The…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.