Legal Opinion

Acushnet Federal Credit Union v. Roderick

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided November 28, 1988No. 87-1260PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.

Upon a jury verdict, a judgment in the amount of $3,315.25 was entered in favor of the plaintiff, Acushnet Federal Credit Union (Credit Union). That sum reflected the unpaid principal on a promissory note ($2,878.71), plus interest.

1. Jury instruction. In the face of a timely and correct request for jury instruction, the trial judge erroneously charged the jury as to the tort of misrepresentation thus: “. . . that the Credit Union made the misrepresentations knowing that the statements made were false.” The instruction is in error because under Massachusetts law actionable misrepresentation…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Nei v. BurleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  2. Yorke v. TaylorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
  3. Glickman v. BrownMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  4. Service Publications, Inc. v. GovermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  5. Griffin v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Linkage Corp. v. Trustees of Boston UniversityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  2. Zimmerman v. KentMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
  3. Cummings v. HPG International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  4. Kattar v. DemoulasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  5. International Totalizing Systems, Inc. v. PepsiCo, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1990

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API