Acushnet Federal Credit Union v. Roderick
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.
Upon a jury verdict, a judgment in the amount of $3,315.25 was entered in favor of the plaintiff, Acushnet Federal Credit Union (Credit Union). That sum reflected the unpaid principal on a promissory note ($2,878.71), plus interest.
1. Jury instruction. In the face of a timely and correct request for jury instruction, the trial judge erroneously charged the jury as to the tort of misrepresentation thus: “. . . that the Credit Union made the misrepresentations knowing that the statements made were false.” The instruction is in error because under Massachusetts law actionable misrepresentation…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Nei v. BurleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Yorke v. TaylorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
- Glickman v. BrownMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
- Service Publications, Inc. v. GovermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- Griffin v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Linkage Corp. v. Trustees of Boston UniversityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Zimmerman v. KentMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
- Cummings v. HPG International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Kattar v. DemoulasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- International Totalizing Systems, Inc. v. PepsiCo, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1990
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.