Legal Opinion

Root Refineries v. Gay Oil Company

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 17, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, J.,

(after stating the facts). It is conceded that the claim of the plaintiff was submitted to the jury upon proper instructions and that it is concluded by the verdict of the jury as to the account sued on by it.

It is claimed, however, that there is nothing in the record to show that the plaintiff assumed the debts and liabilities of the Petroleum Products Company, and that it is not liable to the defendant for any claim it might have against the Petroleum Products Company. 'This is true, but the liability attaches on other grounds.

The Petroleum Products Company sold and conveyed its…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Boise Ass'n of Credit Men, Ltd. v. EllisIdaho Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Fisk Rubber Company, Inc. v. Hinson Auto CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  3. Ramey-Milburn Co. v. SevickSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  4. Robbins v. FullerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  5. North American Provision Co. v. Fischer Lime & Cement Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gaspee Cab Inc. v. McGovernSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1931
  2. Gretzinger v. Wynne Wholesale Grocer Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  3. Gaspee Cab Co. v. McGovernSuperior Court of Rhode Island · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API