Legal Opinion

Micamold Radio Corp. v. Beedie

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1935PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCropsey, J.

In this action the plaintiff seeks an injunction. The matter involved is a labor dispute. At the close of the trial the court decided the facts in favor of the plaintiff and, in effect, held that an injunction should issue unless the provisions of chapter 477 of the Laws of 1935 prevented such issuance. Briefs were invited upon the applicability of this statute and as to its constitutionality, should its applicability be determined. So far as the briefs reveal, this question has never been passed upon in this State.

The statute amends the Civil Practice Act by adding to it a new section…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Duplex Printing Press Co. v. DeeringSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Union Pacific Railroad v. Laramie Stock Yards Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Jacobus v. . ColgateNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  4. Matter of Berkovitz v. . Arbib HoulbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  5. Bachman v. . HarringtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1906

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hammack v. Monroe Street Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Ford v. City of CaldwellIdaho Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Lewittes & Sons, Inc. v. PerlowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  4. De Agostina v. HolmdenNew York Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Kommel v. KarronCity of New York Municipal Court · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API