Legal Opinion
Pauma Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Pauma & Yuima Reservation v. Unite Here Int'l Union
District Court, S.D. California
Decided September 28, 2018No. Case No. 16-cv-2660-BAS-AGSPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Hon. Cynthia Bashant, United States District Judge
OVERVIEW
This action is an offshoot from a bitter labor dispute between a union and a casino operator. Plaintiff Pauma Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Pauma & Yuima Reservation ("Pauma" or "Tribe") is a federally-recognized tribe that operates Casino Pauma on its reservation in Northern San Diego County. "About 2,900 customers visit Casino Pauma each day," and the Casino "employs 462 employees." Pauma v. N.L.R.B. , 888 F.3d 1066, 1070 (9th Cir. 2018).
In 2013, Defendant UNITE HERE International Union ("Union"), which represents service…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Oneida Indian Nation v. PhillipsDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2018