Legal Opinion

Bacon v. Marshall

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 15, 1873PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Washington Pistriot Court. Thursday, December 11. Action on contract. Demurrer to petition sustained. Attachment quashed on motion of defendant. Plaintiff appeals. The facts appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

I. The plaintiff alleges in his petition, that on the 14th day of May, 1872, one A. D. Marshall obtained a judgment against him in the circuit court of Washington county for $706.80 and costs; that plaintiff filed a sufficient bond and took a stay of execution on said judgment; that on the 22d day of September, 1872, the defendant, S. M. Marshall, entered into a written contract with plaintiff to pay said judgment, which contract is as follows:

A. D. Marshall j John ¿Bacon. }

Washi/nqton Cowit/u, 1<ma'

' Judgment May 14, 1872........................ $706 80

Costs...................................…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stout v. FolgerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brown v. CairnsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  2. Vorse v. Des Moines Marble & Mantel Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API