Legal Opinion

Trumbull County Bar Ass'n v. Donlin

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1996No. 96-442PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.

Because the evidence is insufficient to support a violation of DR 2-110(A)(2), this court finds that the complaint against respondent, Patrick J. Donlin, should be dismissed.

DR 2-110(A)(2) states, in pertinent part, that “ * * * a lawyer shall not withdraw from employment until he has taken reasonable steps to avoid foreseeable prejudice to the rights of his client, including giving due notice to his client * * *.” The panel concluded that respondent violated DR 2-110(A)(2) because he “did not effectively deal with a difficult situation” regarding the withdrawal…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. VenezianoOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Trumbull Cty. Bar Assn. v. DonlinOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Ass'n v. FreemanOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. PritchardOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. KishOhio Supreme Court · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API