Legal Opinion

In Re Teeters

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRand, J.

The plaintiff, George E. Teeters, appeals from an order in a habeas corpus proceeding dismissing the writ and refusing to discharge him from arrest and imprisonment under a body execution issued in a civil action. The facts are as follows :

On March 9, 1921, one Lawrence L. Lee obtained a judgment in the sum of $1,900 in the Circuit Court for Multnomah County in an action wherein he was plaintiff and Teeters, the plaintiff herein, was defendant. The judgment was entered on stipulation of the attorneys in the case and while Teeters was absent in another state and before the cause was at issue.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex parte TiceOregon Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Barton v. SaundersOregon Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Ex parte FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Banning v. RoyOregon Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Heckinger v. SwankOregon Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. National Discount Corp. v. O'MellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
  2. Walker v. SutherlandOregon Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API