Legal Opinion
Martin Van Bain v. Emodell Coal Company
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 6, 1991No. 90-3806Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
944 F.2d 906
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Martin VAN BAIN, Petitioner,
v.
EMODELL COAL COMPANY, et al., Respondents.
No. 90-3806.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Sept. 6, 1991.
Before NATHANIEL R. JONES and SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judges, and LIVELY, Senior Circuit Judge.
2Per curiam
1
The petitioner Martin Van Bain seeks review of a decision of the Benefits Review Board affirming…
3Cases cited1 opinion
- Walter Wiley v. Consolidation Coal Company, Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, Parties-In-InterestCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990