Duffy v. Cooke
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 361, Jan. T., 1912, by plaintiff, from.judgment of C. P. No. 2, Philadelphia Co., Dec. T., 1911, No. 5383, denying writ of peremptory mandamus in case of Samuel Duffy v. Morris L. Cooke, Director of Department of Public Works of the City of Philadelphia. Before Fell, C. J., Petition for mandamus to compel Director of Public Works to reinstate plaintiff as general foreman in Bureau of Water of the City of Philadelphia.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 361, Jan. T., 1912, by plaintiff, from.judgment of C. P. No. 2, Philadelphia Co., Dec. T., 1911, No. 5383, denying writ of peremptory mandamus in case of Samuel Duffy v. Morris L. Cooke, Director of Department of Public Works of the City of Philadelphia. Before Fell, C. J., Petition for mandamus to compel Director of Public Works to reinstate plaintiff as general foreman in Bureau of Water of the City of Philadelphia. Sulzberger, P. J., filed the following opinion: The plaintiff, a general foreman in the Bureau of Water of the Department of Public Works of the City of…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The order appealed from is affirmed on the opinion of the learned president judge of the Common Pleas.
2Cited by31 opinions
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Fox v. SwingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Lincoln v. National Tube Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Commonwealth v. Provident Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- R. C. McCormick Cross v. Edwin W. Edwards, Etc., CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Seattle High School Chapter No. 200 v. SharplesWashington Supreme Court · 1930
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.