Legal Opinion
Richman v. Neuberger
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided June 13, 1956Published
1Opinion of the Court
22 N.J. 28 (1956)
123 A.2d 217
GROVER C. RICHMAN, JR., ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
KATHERINE K. NEUBERGER, HALSEY W. STICKEL, HARRISON L. TODD AND EVELYN M. SEUFERT, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued May 7, 1956.
Decided June 13, 1956.
Mr. Harold Kolovsky, Assistant Attorney-General, argued the cause for the plaintiff-appellant (Mr. Grover C. Richman, Jr., Attorney-General of New Jersey).
Mr. James A. Major argued the cause for the defendant-respondent Evelyn M. Seufert.
Mr. Walter H. Jones argued the cause as amicus curiae for the Senate and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- In re Di BrizziNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Behnke v. New Jersey Highway AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- Massett Building Co. v. BennettSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- State v. MurzdaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.