Legal Opinion

John v. Faitak

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided April 10, 2019No. CV-17-862PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWaymond M. Brown, Judge

Appellant appeals from the circuit court's order granting summary judgment in favor of appellee. On appeal, appellant's sole argument is that appellee is not entitled to immunity for acts that exceed the scope of his appointment. We affirm.

Appellant and Megan Bolinder conceived I.J. out of wedlock and he was born on March 12, 2010. The parties ended their relationship a couple of months later in May 2010. Thereafter, their less-than-stellar co-parenting relationship led them to litigation over custody of I.J. Bolinder was awarded custody of I.J., subject to appellant's visitation, in the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Cleavinger v. SaxnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Chambers v. SternSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  4. Sykes v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  5. Jackson v. Sparks Regional Medical CenterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. J. David John v. Martin T. Faitak, ph.D.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API