Legal Opinion

Ladish Co. v. Department of Revenue

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1975No. 23 (1974)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.

With the facts stipulated, the issues raised on this appeal are issues of law as to right of the taxpayer to deduct pay accruals for the last nine months of each calendar year.

Time of accrual.

Both parties apparently agree that if the employees’ right to vacation pay has vested in such employees at the end of the calendar year, then the amount of money in the employer’s vacation pay account is properly deductible. Read together, the statute governing corporate deductions 1 and the statute defining the terms, “paid” or “actually paid,” 2 do compel the conclusion that payments to employees…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. American Automobile Assn. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. World Airways, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1974
  4. Oberman Mfg. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1967
  5. Eau Claire National Bank v. BensonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ladish Malting Co. v. Wisconsin Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
  2. Webster v. Wisconsin Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
  3. Wisconsin Department of Revenue v. Sentry Financial Services Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API