Legal Opinion

Crock Construction Co. v. Stanley Miller Construction Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1993No. Nos. 92-1018 and 92-1389PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.

This case requires us to construe the provision of former R.C. 1311.26 which specified that a “sworn and itemized statement of the amount and value” of labor performed and material or machinery furnished be filed when seeking a mechanic’s lien in connection with a public works project.1 (Emphasis added.)

*591The principal issue to be addressed is whether the sworn statement filed by appellees was insufficient, as a matter of law, to establish a mechanic’s lien. The trial court found the statement to be insufficient, due to the failure to itemize, and granted appellant’s Civ.R. 56(C) motion for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Robert v. Clapp Co. v. FoxOhio Supreme Court · 1931
  2. C. C. Constance & Sons v. LayOhio Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Banks v. City of CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Asti v. Ohio Department of Youth ServicesOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Guernsey Bank v. Milano Sports Enterprises, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. McGarry & Sons, Inc. v. Constr. Resources One, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Danopulos v. Am. Trading II, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Zara Constr., Inc. v. BelcastroOhio Court of Appeals · 2022

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API