Rudolph J. Wolf v. Jane Phillips Episcopal-Memorial Medical Center
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LEWIS, Chief Judge.
The sole question presented here is whether the plaintiff’s complaint stated facts sufficient to constitute a claim for relief under section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1. The United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma alternatively concluded that the acts complained of by the plaintiff did not affect the interstate commerce of a business engaged in interstate commerce and, citing Page v. Work, 9 Cir., 290 F.2d 323, cert. denied, 368 U.S. 875, 82 S.Ct. 121, 7 L.Ed.2d 76, granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Apex Hosiery Co. v. LeaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. Oregon State Medical SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Mandeville Island Farms, Inc. v. American Crystal Sugar Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- A. Peter Crane, M.D. v. Intermountain Health Care, Inc. And Sidney G. GarrettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- R. Anthony Marrese, M.D., and Bone & Joint Surgeons, Inc. v. Interqual, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Cardio-Medical Associates, Ltd v. Crozer-Chester Medical CenterDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
- Bryan v. Stillwater Board of RealtorsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
- United States Dental Institute v. American Association of OrthodontistsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1975
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.