Legal Opinion

United States v. Kent

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 17, 1979No. 78-3438PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANCE, Circuit Judge:

The government appeals the dismissal of an indictment for mail fraud, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341 and 2, and conspiracy to commit mail fraud, id. § 371, charged against Lauren Lee Smith, Jr., William Thomas Kent, Patrick Petroleum Corp. of Michigan, Charles Douglas Robinson, and Ronald Lamar Meeks. These charges arose from the alleged defalcation by Smith, receipt by Kent, and use by the other appellees of confidential geophysical data belonging to Smith’s employer, Union Oil Co. of California. We find the indictment sufficient and reverse the order of dismissal.

I

The indictment…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. United States v. MazeSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Kann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Parr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. United States v. SampsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. United States v. George WuagneuxCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
  2. United States v. RybickiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  3. United States v. James C. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  4. United States v. Calvin Lamar Bosby, Alan Maurice Ticey, and Charles F. Hill, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
  5. United States v. S. Sam CaldwellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API