Legal Opinion

Cari, LLC v. 415 Greenwich Fee Owner, LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 31, 2012PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The contracts’ termination provision provided that plaintiff could cancel the agreement for any reason and obtain the return of its deposit with interest, so long as it provided written notice to defendant sponsor no later than 10 days before closing. The court correctly determined that the termination provision rendered the contracts unenforceable for lack of mutual consideration (see Dorman v Cohen, 66 AD2d 411, 415, 418 [1979]). The obligation to provide written notice of termination does not constitute consideration where, as here, termination occurs immediately upon notice, and not after…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McCall Co. v. . WrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. McCall Co. v. WrightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  3. Dorman v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  4. J. Doe No. 1 v. CBS Broadcasting Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  5. Celle v. Barclays Bank P.L.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Saivest Empreendimentos Imobiliarios E. Participacoes, Ltda v. Elman Investors, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. Saivest Empreendimentos Imobiliarios E. Participacoes, Ltda v. Elman Investors, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API