Teague v. . Atlantic Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Per curiam
We tbink tbe judgment of tbe court below correct.
Tbe Full commission cited numerous authorities to sustain its award, and in tbe final conclusions of law stated: “Under tbe facts of this case we do not believe that Teague’s injury arose out of bis employment. In other words, we do not find a causal connection between tbe conditions under which bis work was required to be done and tbe resulting injury. His injury did not follow as a natural incident of tbe work. We conclude that there was no causal connection between tbe conditions under which tbe work was required to be performed and tbe…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Hoyle v. Isenhour Brick & Tile Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Hensley v. Caswell Action Committee, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Rivera v. TrappCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- Spratt v. Duke Power Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Weaver v. DedmonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.