Legal Opinion

Howard v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 25, 1995No. 94-2570PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Todd Howard appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Appellant filed his motion pursuant to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.850 and 3.800(a). The trial court correctly concluded that appellant failed to timely file the motion with respect to the rule 3.850 issues. However, appellant timely raised four issues under the provisions of rule 3.800(a). As to those issues, we find no merit in appellant’s challenge of the constitutionality of section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1989), nor in his contention that the trial court erred in not using a sentencing guidelines…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hale v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  2. Daniels v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  3. Brooks v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  4. Reeves v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  5. Holley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. MacIas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  2. Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  3. Long v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API