Legal Opinion
Pierce v. United Home Life Insurance
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Decided November 26, 2012No. Civil Action No. 3:11CV790TSL-MTPPublished
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
TOM S. LEE, District Judge.
This cause is before the court on the motion of defendant United Home Life Insurance Company (United) for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff Roland Pierce has responded to the motion and the court, having considered the memoranda of authorities, together with attachments, submitted by the parties, concludes that the motion is well taken and should be granted.
Roland Pierce alleges in this case that he is the beneficiary of a $75,000 life insurance policy issued by United to his father,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bankers Life & Cas. Co. v. CrenshawMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
- Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. LavoieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- Mattox v. Western Fidelity InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1988
- Rachel B. Carroll Cynthia B. Fasano, Plaintiffs-Counter v. Metropolitan Insurance and Annuity Co., Defendant-Counter Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. NicholsonDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.