Legal Opinion

Rohring v. City of Niagara Falls

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 14, 1992PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion denied, third-party complaint reinstated and stay vacated. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting the motion of third-party defendant Falls Steel Erectors, Inc. (Falls Steel) to renew and, upon such renewal, granting Falls Steel’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint of the City of Niagara Falls (City). That same relief had been previously denied by Supreme Court in its order of January 24, 1990, which granted the City’s motion to dismiss Falls Steel’s affirmative defenses and denied Falls Steel’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lancaster Silo & Block Co. v. Northern Propane Gas Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  2. Bolm v. Triumph Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  3. Banow v. SiminsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rohring v. City of Niagara FallsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Shroid Construction, Inc. v. DattomaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Oyster Bay Associates Limited Partnership v. Town Board of Oyster BayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  4. Booth v. 3669 Delaware, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API