Legal Opinion

Hanel v. Crossland Mortgage Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 12, 1997No. 96-02484Published

1Opinion of the Court

NORTHCUTT, Judge.

Laurie M. Hanel challenges the summary foreclosure judgment entered against her in favor of the appellee, Crossland Mortgage Corp., based on false representations and nondisclosures in connection with the loan application process. We agree with the trial court that Hanel’s false statements were undisputed and material. Because there exists no genuine issue of material fact or the possibility of any issue, we must affirm the foreclosure judgment. See Gomes v. Stevens, 548 So.2d 1163, 1164 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989).

However, we reverse, in part, the order granting Crossland attorney’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. RoweSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. Gomes v. StevensDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  3. Park Lane Condominium Ass'n, Inc. v. DePaduaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  4. Consolidated Southern Sec., Inc. v. Geniac and Associates, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  5. Garvin v. SquiersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API