Legal Opinion

Majestic Radiator Enclosure Co. v. County Commissioners of Middlesex

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 14, 1986PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiffs appeal from the rulings of a Superior Court judge denying their motion for summary judgment and granting summary judgment in favor of the defendants. We granted the plaintiffs’ application for direct appellate review. We affirm.

We summarize the undisputed facts on the cross motions for summary judgment. Sometime in June or July, 1979, Neil Tánger, the president of Majestic Radiator Enclosure Company, Inc. (Majestic), wrote solicitation letters to the administrators of various nursing homes and hospitals bringing to their attention a legal requirement which pertained to radiator…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Revere v. Massachusetts General HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Phipps Products Corp. v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  3. Massachusetts General Hospital v. City of RevereMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  4. Urban Transport, Inc. v. Mayor of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Baltazar Contractors, Inc. v. Town of LunenburgMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
  2. Brasi Development Corp. v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  3. E. Amanti & Sons, Inc. v. R.C. Griffin, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
  4. Andrews v. City of SpringfieldMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
  5. City of Westfield v. Harris & Associates Painting, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API