Legal Opinion

Carr v. Carr

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1904No. Docket No. 103PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Calhoun; Hopkins, J. Bill by Mary E. Carr and others against Hugh Carr to restrain the foreclosure of a mortgage. Defendant filed an answer in the nature of a cross-bill asking for the foreclosure of said mortgage. From a decree for defendant for less than the amount claimed, he appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, C. J.

December 20, 1873, James Carr made a mortgage to his brother, Hugh Carr, the defendant, for the sum of $1,400, due seven years from date, with interest at 10 per cent, per annum. April 15, 1902, James Carr died intestate, leaving the complainants, Mary E. - Carr, his widow, William Carr, his son, and Eva Elwell, a daughter, as his only heirs surviving. November 20, 1902, defendant commenced foreclosure of the mortgage *398by newspaper advertisement. January 24, 1903, complainants filed this bill, obtained an injunction restraining the foreclosure proceedings at law, alleging the mortgage was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rumsey v. Settle's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hertzberg & Noveck v. Ira J. SpoonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  2. Glass v. DrieborgMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Newton v. FreemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Rodgers v. RobsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API