Legal Opinion

Duval and Rice v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 17, 1926PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCulloch, C. J.

Appellants, Dave DuVal and Jethro Rice, together with George Seymore, were each indicted for the separate offenses of possessing a still-worm, for manufacturing mash, and for manufacturing liquor, and by consent all the cases against all of the defendants were tried together, resulting in the conviction of each of them for the offenses named, and DuVal and Rice have prosecuted their appeal to this court.

John Hopper and two other prohibition officers testified in substance that, after receiving information that a still was being operated on a certain farm about twenty-five miles east of Little…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Melton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  2. Noyes v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  3. McMillar v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Caton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  2. Willis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  3. Ham v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  4. Seward v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  5. Bunch v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API