Legal Opinion

State v. Grant

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1969No. 688SC256Published

1Opinion of the CourtMallard, C.J.

Defendant contends the trial court committed error in the charge in stating a stipulation entered into by the State and the defendant. On page fourteen of the record the stipulation is set out as follows;

*587“At this point it is stipulated that if Mr. Lutz were present in Court he would stipulate that he had administered a blood alcohol test on the defendant and that the test showed that the defendant had a content of point twenty-two {.22%) alcohol in his blood stream.”

The entire portion of the charge of the court excepted to reads, “However, it has been stipulated by his counsel that the result…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  2. State v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API