Legal Opinion

Seaux v. Doucet

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 11, 1996No. 96-854PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

liAMY, Judge.

Third-party plaintiff, John B. Doucet, appeals a judgment of the trial court finding that his claim against third-party defendant, the Edwards Law Firm, has prescribed. For the following reasons, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.

DISCUSSION OF THE RECORD

The instant ■ matter originated when John Doucet sued Ores Seaux for breach of con*539tract. The record reveals that Doucet, represented by the Edwards Law Firm (Edwards), completed a contingency contract with that firm. A judgment was rendered in favor of Doucet on June 1,1989, which Seaux subsequently paid. Christopher Edwards of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dowell v. HollingsworthLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
  2. Leyva v. LagaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. Bustamente v. VezinaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Ward v. AbasiLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. Doucet v. SeauxLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bourque v. HoychickLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
  2. SUCCESSION OF CALDARERA v. ZenoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. SUCCESSION OF CALDARERA v. ZenoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API