Seaux v. Doucet
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
liAMY, Judge.
Third-party plaintiff, John B. Doucet, appeals a judgment of the trial court finding that his claim against third-party defendant, the Edwards Law Firm, has prescribed. For the following reasons, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.
DISCUSSION OF THE RECORD
The instant ■ matter originated when John Doucet sued Ores Seaux for breach of con*539tract. The record reveals that Doucet, represented by the Edwards Law Firm (Edwards), completed a contingency contract with that firm. A judgment was rendered in favor of Doucet on June 1,1989, which Seaux subsequently paid. Christopher Edwards of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dowell v. HollingsworthLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
- Leyva v. LagaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1989
- Bustamente v. VezinaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
- Ward v. AbasiLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
- Doucet v. SeauxLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bourque v. HoychickLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
- SUCCESSION OF CALDARERA v. ZenoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
- SUCCESSION OF CALDARERA v. ZenoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010