Alexander v. Chadwick

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA MICHAEL ALEXANDER, 5 Case No. 2:22-cv-01084-CDS-NJK Plaintiff, 6 Order v. 7 [Docket No. 63] 8 COREY CHADWICK, 9 Defendant. 10 Pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion to quash subpoenas and for protective 11 order. Docket No. 63. Plaintiff filed a response. Docket No. 73. Defendant filed a reply. Docket 12 No. 75. The motion is properly resolved without a hearing. See Local Rule 78-1. 13 Defendant’s motion is not sufficiently developed.1 There is a general rule that only the 14 party to which a subpoena is directed has standing to…