Legal Opinion

Hagen v. Bank of Piedmont

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 12, 1989No. 15898PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREWITT, Judge.

Appellants appeal from an order dissolving a temporary restraining order and refusing to issue a preliminary injunction to enjoin the foreclosure of a deed of trust. The temporary restraining order was ap parently granted with notice to respondents so it was not limited to a time “not to exceed ten days”. See Rule 92.02(b).

We first consider whether an appeal lies. Generally orders entered during the temporary injunction stage are not final orders, thus no appeal lies from the denial of a preliminary injunction. Eickelmann v. Eickelmann, 724 S.W.2d 261, 262 (Mo.App.1986); C.M.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Community Title Co. v. Roosevelt Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Hudson v. School District of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Bayer v. Associated Underwriters, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. Frimel v. HumphreyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. J AND P TRUST v. Continental Plants Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Barkley v. Carter County State BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Burney v. McLaughlinMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Coursen v. City of SarcoxieMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. State ex rel. Myers Memorial Airport Committee, Inc. v. City of CarthageMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Southwest Mall Associates v. Top Brands Distributors, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API