Hardy v. Industrial Commission of Utah
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MOFFAT, Justice.
This is an appeal from a decision of the Industrial Commission of Utah, denying an award to the plaintiff.
On the 8th day of July, 1928, the plaintiff wrote a letter to the Industrial Commission of Utah in which he in substance saidi: On October 25, 1927, while working for Philip Biesinger, he was injured, that a disability resulted, an operation had been performed, that the Commercial Casualty Insurance Company assumed responsibility as insurance carrier until May 21, 1928, when the insurance carrier denied further responsibility; that he was still under a doctor’s care and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Spring Canyon Coal Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1921
- Utah Consol. Mining Co. v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1920
- Rezaldo v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1923
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States Smelting, Refining & Mining Co. v. NielsenUtah Supreme Court · 1967
- Petersen v. Utah Labor Comm'nUtah Supreme Court · 2017
- Utah Apex Mining Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1949
- Petersen v. Utah Labor Comm'nUtah Supreme Court · 2017
- United States Smelting, Refining & Mining Co. v. NielsenUtah Supreme Court · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.