Legal Opinion

Hardy v. Industrial Commission of Utah

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1936No. 5774PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOFFAT, Justice.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Industrial Commission of Utah, denying an award to the plaintiff.

On the 8th day of July, 1928, the plaintiff wrote a letter to the Industrial Commission of Utah in which he in substance saidi: On October 25, 1927, while working for Philip Biesinger, he was injured, that a disability resulted, an operation had been performed, that the Commercial Casualty Insurance Company assumed responsibility as insurance carrier until May 21, 1928, when the insurance carrier denied further responsibility; that he was still under a doctor’s care and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Spring Canyon Coal Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Utah Consol. Mining Co. v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Rezaldo v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States Smelting, Refining & Mining Co. v. NielsenUtah Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Petersen v. Utah Labor Comm'nUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Utah Apex Mining Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Petersen v. Utah Labor Comm'nUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  5. United States Smelting, Refining & Mining Co. v. NielsenUtah Supreme Court · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API