Wheeler v. City of Arkadelphia
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Frank Holt, Justice.
Appellants were convicted of various misdemeanors in a municipal court. These misdemeanors consisted of assaults and batteries and disturbances of the peace. The circuit court held the appellants had not perfected their appeals and dismissed them. For reversal the appellants contend “[Ajppellants made effort to perfect their appeals and substantially complied with Ark. Stat. Ann. § 26-1301, 1302, 1306 and 1307.’’ We think the circuit court was correct.
It appears from the record before us that appellants only compliance with the procedural requirements for appeal was filing…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gleason v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1956
- Whiteley v. PickensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
- Brown v. CurtisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
- Sheridan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
- Messina v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Edwards v. City of ConwaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
- Hawkins v. City of Prairie GroveCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1993
- Edwards v. City of ConwaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989