In the Interest of A. T.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Blackburn, Presiding Judge.
Following the termination of her parental rights to her two children, the mother of A. T. and D. T. appeals, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence. Because no evidence showed any serious physical, mental, emotional, or moral harm to the children, we reverse.
*471The following standard applies when a parent challenges the sufficiency of the evidence in a termination rights case:
On appeal, we must determine whether, after reviewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the lower court’s judgments, any rational trier of fact could have found by clear and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In the Interest of E. C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- In the Interest of K. J.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- In the Interest of R. W.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- In the Interest of J. H.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
3Cited by21 opinions
- In the Interest of L. G.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- In the Interest of D. T. A.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- In the Interest of D. L. T. C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- In re K. W.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- In the Interest of E. M. D.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.