Legal Opinion

Smith v. Hern

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 9, 1918No. 20,911PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Reno district court; Frank F. Prigg, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

The plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for false arrest. A jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendant, judgment was rendered in his favor, and the plaintiff appeals.

1. The plaintiff’s original petition was attacked by á motion asking the court to require the plaintiff to amend the petition in a number of particulars. That motion was allowed in part and denied in part. An amended petition was then filed; that petition was attacked by another motion, which was allowed in part and denied in part. A second amended…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. ReedSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
  2. State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
  3. State ex rel. Little v. SpencerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
  4. State v. KirbySupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  5. State v. FolwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Woodhouse v. Woodhouse Et Ux.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1925
  2. State v. KingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  3. Torson v. BaehniSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  4. Brown v. LarimerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  5. Taft v. HyattSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API