Legal Opinion

Ross v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 16, 2003No. A02A1909PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ruffin, Presiding Judge.

A jury found Taiwan Ross guilty of one count of burglary and acquitted him of a second count of burglary. Ross appeals, asserting that he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Because we find that Ross did not timely file his notice of appeal, his appeal is dismissed.

The record shows that the jury returned its verdict on August 15, 2000, and the trial court sentenced Ross that same day. Upon imposing the sentence, the trial judge informed Ross, who was represented by counsel, as follows:

you have the right to seek post-judgment relief from your conviction! ]…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rowland v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  2. Veasley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  3. Peters v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  4. Andrew L. Parks, Inc. v. Suntrust Bank, West Georgia, N.A.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  5. In the Interest of H. L. W.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rocha v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  2. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  3. Ross v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API