Legal Opinion · Dissent

Little v. Mississippi Department of Transportation

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 2013No. 2011-CT-00693-SCTPublished

1DissentWaller, Chief Justice

¶ 18. I agree that the Mississippi Department of Transportation (“MDOT”)3 is required to inspect and maintain state highways; however, the implementation of maintenance is discretionary because it involves decisions made by employees which must be based on considerations of public policy. Because of this Court’s longstanding bright-line rule that road maintenance and repair is discretionary, I respectfully dissent.

¶ 19. In Mississippi Transportation Commission v. Montgomery, 80 So.3d 789 (Miss.2012), we wrote that, if Section 65-1-65 was “the only statutory provision at issue, we would find…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. LW v. McComb Separate Mun. School Dist.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Mohundro v. Alcorn CountyMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Mississippi Dept. of Transp. v. CargileMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Mississippi Transportation Commission v. MontgomeryMississippi Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State v. LewisMississippi Supreme Court · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API