Little v. Mississippi Department of Transportation
Mississippi Supreme Court
1DissentWaller, Chief Justice
¶ 18. I agree that the Mississippi Department of Transportation (“MDOT”)3 is required to inspect and maintain state highways; however, the implementation of maintenance is discretionary because it involves decisions made by employees which must be based on considerations of public policy. Because of this Court’s longstanding bright-line rule that road maintenance and repair is discretionary, I respectfully dissent.
¶ 19. In Mississippi Transportation Commission v. Montgomery, 80 So.3d 789 (Miss.2012), we wrote that, if Section 65-1-65 was “the only statutory provision at issue, we would find…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- LW v. McComb Separate Mun. School Dist.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1999
- Mohundro v. Alcorn CountyMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
- Mississippi Dept. of Transp. v. CargileMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
- Mississippi Transportation Commission v. MontgomeryMississippi Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. LewisMississippi Supreme Court · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.