Bill Dreiling Motor Company v. Shultz
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Moore. *
Defendants in error were plaintiffs in the trial court and will be referred to herein as plaintiffs or by name. Plaintiff in error will be referred to as defendant or as Dreiling.
The complaint of plaintiffs contained two claims for relief: (1) Rescission of a contract allegedly procured by false representation; and (2) damages for breach of warranties contained in the contract sought to be rescinded in the first claim. On motion of defendant, plaintiffs were required to elect as between the two claims, and they elected to proceed upon their claim for rescission.
Th…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Clemann v. BandimereSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
3Cited by22 opinions
- Keller v. A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Christensen v. HooverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- Ficor, Inc. v. McHughSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- Tinker v. De Maria Porsche Audi, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Dinosaur Park Investments, L.L.C. v. TelloColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.