Legal Opinion

Wiacek v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided July 29, 1992No. 2:92-cv-72877PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ZATKOFF, District Judge.

In resolving plaintiffs’ motion to remand, the Court holds that a non-diverse defendant, that was fraudulently joined and involuntarily dismissed in state court, does not destroy complete diversity of citizenship for purposes of establishing subject matter jurisdiction upon removal.

I

This is a slip and fall case and it is before the Court on plaintiffs’ motion to remand to the Wayne County Circuit Court — the Court from which it was removed. Defendants have filed a response brief and a supplemental brief. 1 Pursuant to E.D.Mich.Loeal R.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Great Northern Railway Co. v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. Wilson v. Republic Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Ross v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Gus Poulos and A.G.P. Marketing v. Naas Foods, Incorporated and Ranks, Hovis, McDougall Plc Group (Rhm Holdings U.S.A. Incorporated)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hardy v. Ajax Magnathermic Corp.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2000
  2. Freeman v. Unisys Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1994
  3. Ludwig v. Learjet, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1993
  4. Yanakeff v. SIGNATURE XVDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1993
  5. Young v. Bailey Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API