Wiacek v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ZATKOFF, District Judge.
In resolving plaintiffs’ motion to remand, the Court holds that a non-diverse defendant, that was fraudulently joined and involuntarily dismissed in state court, does not destroy complete diversity of citizenship for purposes of establishing subject matter jurisdiction upon removal.
I
This is a slip and fall case and it is before the Court on plaintiffs’ motion to remand to the Wayne County Circuit Court — the Court from which it was removed. Defendants have filed a response brief and a supplemental brief. 1 Pursuant to E.D.Mich.Loeal R.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Wilson v. Republic Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Ross v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
- Gus Poulos and A.G.P. Marketing v. Naas Foods, Incorporated and Ranks, Hovis, McDougall Plc Group (Rhm Holdings U.S.A. Incorporated)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hardy v. Ajax Magnathermic Corp.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2000
- Freeman v. Unisys Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1994
- Ludwig v. Learjet, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1993
- Yanakeff v. SIGNATURE XVDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1993
- Young v. Bailey Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.