Legal Opinion

ULUOCHA

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1989No. ID 3124PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Interim Decision #3124 MATTER OF ULUOCHA In Bond Proceedings Pursuant To

8 C.F.R. § 242.2(d) A-26422976 Decided by Board November 15, 1989 (1) The bond regulations-(

8 C.F.R. §§ 3.18(a) and 242.2(d) (1989)), which establish unique and informal proceedings, do not specifically address motions to reopen and do not expressly limit a detained alien to one application for modification of the amount or terms of a bond. (2) Immigration judges can further consider requests to modify bonds by detained aliens without a formal motion to reopen under

8 C.F.R. § 242.22

(1989). (1) Further requests to modify…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. CHEWBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1982

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. VALLESBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1997
  2. Kervensen Prunier v. Brian EnglishDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2026
  3. Michelet Alexis v. WardenDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2026
  4. Negrete Vargas v. WolfDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020
  5. Willian Perez-Cruz v. Brian EnglishDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API