Legal Opinion

Vandegrift v. Meihle

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 25, 1901PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On certiorari to review summary conviction.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Van Syckel, J.

This is a prosecution for selling adulterated milk contrary to the fourth section of the act of 1883. Gen. Stat., p. 1170, pi. 36.

The certiorari is prosecuted to review the summary conviction of the defendant, Meihle, before a justice of the peace.

This court will not review the decision upon questions of fact. If there is legal evidence before the court below upon which the certified judgment can be based, this court will not reverse because the evidence would lead it to a different conclusion. South Brunswick v. Cranbury, 33 Vroom 398.

The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1900
  2. Atlantic City Railroad v. GoodinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1898
  3. Mayer v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1900
  4. Markey v. Consolidated Traction Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1900

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dare v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  2. State v. Lakewood Market Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
  3. City of Newark v. Charlton Holding Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API